UAP 91101 Roots Fort Wayne Religion Ghosts JFK Nikola Tesla Timetravel Sports
GHOSTS. ProjectMoosed Research Lab

The Ghosts Leg · Graded-Evidence Research

Every famous haunting, graded by the record.

This lab reads the primary record behind the legends — the earliest accounts, the court files, the commission reports, the papers the stories rest on — and grades every claim PROVEN, DOCUMENTED, UNPROVEN, MISIDENTIFIED, or FABRICATED. Proven first. Where the record runs out, the finding is “we do not know,” filed as one.

57 CLAIMS GRADED 13 PROVEN 14 DOCUMENTED 18 UNPROVEN 11 MISIDENTIFIED 1 FABRICATED 9 SOURCES IN THE ARCHIVE

Latest Findings

Tuesday, November 3, 2026 — the leg's first day of research: parallel passes over the origins, the famous cases, the controlled science, and the photographs and places, plus a first-hand read of the Seybert Commission's appendix. The day's finds, together:

The confession that started it all — and the murder that was never proven

Margaret Fox Kane's signed 1888 confession — that she and her sister produced the famous raps by fraud — is PROVEN, and so is the Academy of Music demonstration that night, where three physicians agreed the sounds came from the first joint of her large toe. She recanted a year later; that is DOCUMENTED too. What is not proven is the story the raps told: a murdered peddler buried under the house. Nothing in the 1848 record corroborates a murder, and the peddler's famous name, “Charles B. Rosna,” appears nowhere in it — the original pamphlet blanks even the alleged killer's name.

Mumler was never acquitted

The standard story — spirit photographer William Mumler was tried, acquitted, and the court in effect found his photographs genuine — is MISIDENTIFIED. There was no trial. At a preliminary examination, Justice Dowling discharged the complaint because the prosecution could not prove Mumler's method, while stating on the record that he was “morally convinced that trickery and fraud were used.” What the hearing did prove: prosecution photographers produced identical spirit photographs by trickery that defeated expert watchers — including P. T. Barnum, warned and watching every step, who still could not catch how “Abraham Lincoln” appeared behind him.

The sealed letter, the mucilage, and the silk thread

The Commission's appendix, read first-hand for Edition 2, holds the cleanest fraud demonstration in this leg. Acting chairman Furness mailed celebrated medium Dr. J. V. Mansfield a question sealed under five seals. The envelope came back apparently untouched — and the “spirit” answers repeated the sealed question's exact words. Furness cut the envelope open: the seals had been cut out and stuck back with mucilage. Then the control: two identical envelopes, one plain, one with the letter stitched to the flap in red silk under the seals. The plain one was answered. The stitched one “gave no response” — its seals bear the marks of an attempt that stopped where tearing would show. The same appendix dismantles the famous Zöllner endorsement: interviewed in 1886, Wundt, Fechner and Scheibner each qualified or withdrew the conviction Zöllner's book had claimed for them — Scheibner, in his own corrected words: the book “would create the impression” of agreement, “but this is not the case.”

The Bell Witch's paper trail starts earlier than the official line — and it accuses Betsy

“No contemporary sources; earliest mention 1886” is MISIDENTIFIED. A Long-expedition journal entry from October 1820 and a Saturday Evening Post letter from 1856 both predate the 1886 history — and both record the same suspicion: that Betsy Bell produced the voice by ventriloquism. That accusation is not a modern debunker's invention; it is the oldest explanation on record. The famous narrative itself, from Ingram's 1894 book, rests on a manuscript attributed to 1846 that has never been produced for examination. The haunting is UNPROVEN. Ingram's claimed 1849 Post article appears not to exist at all.

Amityville: the murders are court record. The haunting is a wine story

The DeFeo murders are PROVEN from the federal court opinion — including a standing correction: six consecutive 25-to-life sentences, not concurrent as secondary sources repeat. The haunting is UNPROVEN, and the record against it is direct: defense attorney William Weber, on the record in 1979 — “We created this horror story over many bottles of wine”; a federal judge calling the book “to a large extent a work of fiction”; and more than a decade of successor owners reporting nothing. This lab grades both directions: the popular counter-claim that “the Lutzes admitted it was fiction” is also UNPROVEN — their documented position was “mostly true” to the end.

Enfield: the paper that broke the story conceded most of it could be faked

The best-witnessed case in this leg is also the most honestly documented by its own contemporaries. The Daily Mirror conceded within two weeks that most of the phenomena could be simulated, and in 1978 printed the elder girl's confession that the voice was invented — retracted the next day, both on the record. Inside the SPR, officer Anita Gregory concluded the investigators had been “duped by a hoax,” and said so in the Society's own journal. Observed and admitted trickery is DOCUMENTED. The poltergeist is UNPROVEN.

EVP's 0.91 percent problem

Electronic voice phenomena stand or fall on independent recognition — and that is where they fail. When listeners who did not know the “official” interpretation heard the recordings, only 0.91% of scoreable guesses matched what the original researchers claimed the voices said. One of Konstantin Raudive's flagship multilingual examples was identified by native German speakers as ordinary German, plausibly a broadcast leaking through. The dead speaking on tape: UNPROVEN, with the failure mechanism documented. The same tranche produced this leg's cleanest PROVEN: flash-photograph “orbs” are defocused dust backscattering light — a mechanism the camera maker explains and experimenters reproduce on demand.

Fort Wayne had a recognised haunted house in print by 1915

Fort Wayne is not a none-found. On 30 October 1915 the Fort Wayne Daily News treated the Aveline House on Leo Road as the city's recognised haunted house — page 1, read in full for this leg. The Allen County Courthouse phantom was relayed on the record by the court's own administrator in the News-Sentinel. And the Woman in White of the Main Street bridge is documented in print — while her claimed 1800s newspaper origin remains UNPROVEN, with the search for it still open.

Origins & the Séance Era, 1848–1900

Where the modern ghost business starts: Hydesville, spirit photography, and the first commission that investigated the séance room and reported what it actually saw.

G-001PROVEN

The Seybert Commission (U. Penn, 1887) was appointed under Henry Seybert's conditional gift, with the ten members and officers named in the foundation note

Seybert Commission Preliminary Report (1887), G001 archive text read first-hand

G-002PROVEN

The Commission found Henry Slade's slate writing, in the sittings it observed, "fraudulent throughout"

Same report, main text (quoted in foundation note)

G-003MISIDENTIFIED

"The Seybert Commission proved all independent slate writing is fraudulent"

The report expressly calls the universal claim "a mere matter of opinion" and limits its unanimous finding to every instance it observed

G-004PROVEN

The Commission concluded it had discovered "not a single novel fact" and asked to continue investigating

Same report, signed conclusion, May 1887

G-029DOCUMENTED as the record's content

The 1848 Hydesville raps' content (answering spirit, murdered peddler buried under the house)

Tranche 01 (T01-03) — Lewis 1848 pamphlet, signed certificates, read first-hand; the pamphlet records the claims, it does not corroborate them

G-030UNPROVEN

The Hydesville murder itself

Tranche 01 (T01-04) — nothing in the 1848 record independently corroborates a murder, burial, or victim

G-031UNPROVEN / MISIDENTIFIED as an 1848-record fact

The murdered peddler was named "Charles B. Rosna"

Tranche 01 (T01-06) — the name appears nowhere in the Lewis pamphlet; the pamphlet blanks even the alleged killer's name

G-032PROVEN

Margaret Fox Kane's signed confession (NY World, 21 Oct 1888) that she and Katie produced the raps fraudulently

Tranche 01 (T01-07) — signed text read in full; Davenport 1888 independently prints the sisters' authorisation for the exposure

G-033PROVEN

The Academy of Music demonstration (21 Oct 1888): physicians agreed the raps came from the first joint of Margaret's large toe

Tranche 01 (T01-11) — via Davenport printing the World's next-morning report; newspaper original not yet opened (open item)

G-034DOCUMENTED

Margaret's Nov 1889 recantation of the confession

Tranche 01 (T01-12) — as transmitted by Doyle 1922; the 1889 NY Press primary text not yet opened

G-035UNPROVEN

The 1904 Hydesville skeleton was the murdered peddler

Tranche 01 (T01-14) — Boston Journal report DOCUMENTED as printed (via secondary reproduction); identification has no primary support; 1909 ASPR editorial (second-hand) reported mixed human/chicken bones

G-036MISIDENTIFIED

"Mumler was tried and acquitted, and the court in effect found spirit photography genuine"

Tranche 01 (T01-15/T01-20/T01-21) — preliminary examination only; Justice Dowling discharged for failure to prove method while stating he was "morally convinced that trickery and fraud were used" (1869 scrapbook + Hull, read first-hand)

G-037PROVEN

Prosecution experts produced identical spirit-photo effects by trickery that defeated expert watchers (Bogardus's "Lincoln" behind a warned, watching Barnum)

Tranche 01 (T01-18/T01-19) — Hull's contemporary report + Barnum's sworn scrapbook testimony

G-038MISIDENTIFIED

"The Seybert Commission tested and debunked spirit photography"

Tranche 01 (T01-29/T01-30) — the Commission never tested it: Keeler's demanded conditions made investigation "a mere waste of time" (G001 text)

G-049PROVEN

Margaret Fox Kane publicly abjured Spiritualism at the Academy of Music, New York, on 21 Oct 1888, in the words "chiefly instrumental in perpetrating the fraud of Spiritualism upon a too confiding public" and "an absolute falsehood from beginning to end," with Catherine Fox Jencken present assenting

Davenport, The Death-Blow to Spiritualism (1888), archive G003 text read first-hand — speech printed in ch. V; sisters' signed authorization for the book dated 15 Oct 1888 printed at p. v

G-050DOCUMENTED

At that demonstration Margaret produced the raps with her bare right foot on a wooden stool and a committee of three physicians from the audience agreed the sounds were made by the action of the first joint of her large toe

Same book, ch. V — the New York World's 22 Oct 1888 account as reproduced in Davenport; the original World issue has not yet been opened first-hand, so this run does not grade it PROVEN — DIVERGENCE: Tranche 01 graded the same demonstration PROVEN at G-033 on the same Davenport basis; both grades stand logged until the original World issue is read

G-051DOCUMENTED

In Margaret's own account, the Hydesville noises began with apples tied to strings bobbed on the bedroom floor, and the toe-joint rapping was discovered via finger-snapping, Kate first

Same book, ch. VI — Margaret's testimony as quoted in the authorized book; single-source testimony, graded as her statement, not as independently verified fact

G-052DOCUMENTED (as what the book says)

Davenport's book carries the sisters' ages as Margaret born 1840, Catherine ~1.5 years later (8 and 6.5 at the start)

Same book, ch. VI p. 83, read first-hand; DIVERGENCE: conflicts with the commonly carried ~14 / ~11 ages — neither set graded; no birth record read yet (see research note 2026-11-03)

G-053PROVEN

The sealed letter sent to medium Dr. J. V. Mansfield was physically opened and resealed — seals cut out and restored with mucilage, the paper torn beneath three of them

Seybert appendix, "Sealed Letters" (G001 text read first-hand) — Furness cut the returned envelope open at the edges and found the seals cut out and re-gummed; the "spirit" answers repeated the sealed question's exact words

G-054PROVEN

When the follow-up letter was stitched to its envelope with red silk thread beneath the seals, Mansfield returned "no response" — and two seals showed abandoned attempts to start them

Same appendix — the identical twin envelopes No. 1 (plain) and No. 2 (stitched): No. 1 answered after the same seal-cutting; No. 2 unanswerable without tearing, and the attempt marks were found on examination

G-055PROVEN

Henry Slade refused to write on slates sealed by the Commission, saying the spirits had forbidden it

Seybert appendix minutes (G001) — the refusal and its stated reason recorded in the sitting minutes, heard by multiple members (Sellers, Furness, Thompson)

G-056MISIDENTIFIED

"Zöllner's Leipzig colleagues were all convinced the Slade phenomena were genuine and not imposture"

Seybert appendix (G001) — Zöllner's book claims exactly that; Fullerton's 1886 interviews, with notes approved or corrected by the men themselves, contradict it: Wundt (conditions "very unsatisfactory," everything looked like jugglery), Fechner (two sittings, his own observations "unsatisfactory," belief rested on faith in Zöllner), Scheibner (disclaimed competence; Zöllner's book "would create the impression" of agreement — "this is not the case"); only Weber leaned to the phenomena, while stating he knew nothing of jugglery

G-057DOCUMENTED

The named Leipzig witnesses' own qualifications: Fechner attended two sittings with an incipient cataract; Scheibner was a passive, short-sighted spectator who suggested no conditions; Wundt found the slate German was "just such German as Slade spoke"

Same appendix interviews (Wundt's points noted and read back to him; Fechner's translated for his approval; Scheibner's corrected and returned by him)

The Famous Cases

The three most retold hauntings in the record, each graded the same way: the documentary claims first, the haunting claim separately, against the earliest paper that exists.

G-039MISIDENTIFIED

"There are no contemporary Bell Witch sources; the earliest mention is 1886"

Tranche 02 (BW-08) — an Oct 1820 Long-expedition journal entry and the Jan 1856 Saturday Evening Post letter both predate Goodspeed 1886; the defensible claim is only: no 1817–21 newspaper report and no Bell-household document located (search log in tranche-02 §1c)

G-040UNPROVEN

The Bell Witch haunting as narrated by Ingram (1894)

Tranche 02 (BW-02/BW-10) — rests on an 1846-attributed manuscript that has never been produced for examination; events 26–77 years before publication

G-041DOCUMENTED as a period accusation; UNPROVEN as fact

Betsy Bell produced the voice by ventriloquism

Tranche 02 (BW-04/BW-13) — charged in the 1820 journal and asserted outright in the 1856 Post letter; the oldest explanation on record, not a modern invention

G-042UNPROVEN

Ingram's claimed 1849 Saturday Evening Post Bell Witch article (and retraction)

Tranche 02 (BW-05) — CFI library search of complete 1849 issues and 1840–60 found no such article; the only Post item located is the 1856 letter

G-043PROVEN

The DeFeo murders and sentence (six counts; six consecutive 25-to-life terms)

Tranche 02 (AM-01/AM-02) — federal habeas opinion (DeFeo v. Artuz) read first-hand; "concurrent" in secondary sources is wrong per the court record

G-044UNPROVEN

The Amityville haunting

Tranche 02 (AM-04) — sole source is the Lutzes via Anson; contradicted on the record by Weber's fabrication statement, Judge Weinstein's "to a large extent a work of fiction," and 10+ years of successor owners reporting nothing

G-045PROVEN that he said it

William Weber said: "We created this horror story over many bottles of wine" (People, 17 Sep 1979)

Tranche 02 (AM-05) — earliest full on-record fabrication claim; the magazine issue itself not yet opened (open item); Weber's own $2M book-deal conflict is stated in the tranche

G-046UNPROVEN

"The Lutzes admitted it was all fiction"

Tranche 02 (AM-08) — in direct tension with their documented lifelong "mostly true" position; no transcript or the cited Skeptical Inquirer article produced

G-047UNPROVEN

The Enfield poltergeist

Tranche 02 (EN-04) — no phenomenon under controlled conditions; central witnesses repeatedly caught faking; the voice confessed to in print in 1978 (retracted next day)

G-048DOCUMENTED / PROVEN

Observed/admitted trickery by the Enfield girls; SPR-internal dissent (Anita Gregory: investigators "duped by a hoax")

Tranche 02 (EN-05/EN-06/EN-08/EN-11) — Daily Mirror's own 1977 concession that most phenomena were simulable; Janet's 1980 "once or twice" and 2007 "two percent" statements; Gregory's dissent in the SPR's own Psi Encyclopedia and JSPR

Phenomena & the Controlled Record

What happens when the claims meet instruments and experiments: EVP, infrasound, carbon monoxide, haunted-place studies, and the one explanation in this leg that can be produced on demand.

G-017UNPROVEN

Raudive's EVP voices are communications from discarnate beings

Tranche 03 §1 (E-03/E-11) — independent listeners did not converge on his interpretations; only 0.91% of Williams & Blagrove's scoreable EVP guesses matched the original paranormal interpretations

G-018MISIDENTIFIED

One of Raudive's flagship multilingual EVP examples

Tranche 03 §1 (E-06) — identified by native German speakers as ordinary German, plausibly an Easter Sunday broadcast (Keil's test, as reported in Barušs 2001, read in full)

G-019DOCUMENTED

A paranormal prime increases reported voices in ambiguous audio

Tranche 03 §1 (E-08/E-10) — Nees & Phillips abstract + Williams & Blagrove 2022 full text (partial replication: broad effect not significant; narrower EVP-vs-degraded interaction held)

G-020MISIDENTIFIED

Tandy measured his laboratory infrasound at exactly 18.98 Hz, at a level sufficient for physiological effects

Tranche 03 §2 (I-02/I-03) — the 1998 paper, read in full, calls the frequency "quick and dirty" (±10%) and states no sound-pressure level was measured at all

G-021UNPROVEN

Infrasound is an established natural cause of some hauntings

Tranche 03 §2 (I-07) — uncontrolled cases, no dose; French's controlled Haunt Project found no significant infrasound effect

G-022DOCUMENTED

Wilmer's 1921 paper documents a household haunting syndrome resolved when a defective furnace venting CO was found

Tranche 03 §3 (W-01..W-03) — AJO 4(2) 73–90, DOI-verified; narrative read via Donnay's 2004 reproduction; no exposure measurements in the case

G-023UNPROVEN

The Wilmer case establishes CO as a common cause of hauntings generally

Tranche 03 §3 (W-04) — one unmeasured case cannot establish prevalence; the "common cause" framing is later advocacy

G-024DOCUMENTED

Unusual experiences cluster in pre-classified haunted areas (Hampton Court, Edinburgh vaults)

Tranche 03 §4 (S-01/S-05) — Wiseman et al. 2003, full paper read; clustering correlates with environmental features (light, space, height), not prior knowledge

G-025UNPROVEN

That clustering is evidence of ghosts at those locations

Tranche 03 §4 (S-06) — the authors themselves read it as responses to normal environmental features

G-026MISIDENTIFIED

In French's Haunt Project, infrasound/EMF increased anomalous sensations

Tranche 03 §4 (S-07) — the full paper reports no significant main effects or interactions for either factor

G-027PROVEN

Typical flash-photograph "orbs" are defocused airborne particles backscattering flash light

Tranche 03 §5 (O-01..O-03) — Fujifilm's mechanism explainer + on-demand particle demonstrations incl. the 2009 stereo orb-zone test (SPR Psi Encyclopedia)

G-028UNPROVEN

Orbs are established manifestations of spirits

Tranche 03 §5 (O-04) — no test distinguishes a paranormal residue from backscatter; the pro-paranormal encyclopedia entry itself says the claim lacks evidence

Photographs, Film & Places

Famous ghost photographs graded off their publication and provenance records, viral footage traced to its earliest source, and places checked against their own paper trails — starting with Fort Wayne.

G-005DOCUMENTED

The Brown Lady photograph was taken 19 Sep 1936 at Raynham Hall and published in Country Life, 26 Dec 1936 (not 16 Dec as commonly repeated)

Tranche 04 §1.1 — publication chain via the SPR archive file as re-examined by Ruffles, plus the Life (US) 4 Jan 1937 record; original magazine not yet opened first-hand

G-006MISIDENTIFIED

"Two Country Life staff photographers stumbled on the Brown Lady during a routine assignment"

Tranche 04 §1.2 — Shira sought the sitting to photograph the ghost, was a pseudonym and a professional palmist's husband, and sold prints afterwards (Fodor/Herbert reports in the SPR file chain)

G-007MISIDENTIFIED

"The Brown Lady photograph shows Dorothy Walpole"

Tranche 04 §1 — Country Life itself declined that identification; the figure's identity has no record support

G-008UNPROVEN

The Brown Lady apparition itself

Tranche 04 §1.3 — single-witness sighting claim; SPR light-leak and double-exposure readings both DOCUMENTED as analyses, neither proven as the explanation

G-009FABRICATED

The Wem Town Hall "ghost girl" photograph (1995) as a ghost photograph

Tranche 04 §2 — 2010 match to a living girl in a 1922 Wem High Street postcard (Shropshire Star reporting of Lear's match; National Media Museum's earlier doctored verdict); no confession exists and none is claimed

G-010MISIDENTIFIED

"Experts declared the Wem photo genuine"

Tranche 04 §2 — the expert record ran the other way (NMM doctored verdict)

G-011DOCUMENTED

The Lord Combermere photograph (1891) and its circumstances

Tranche 04 §3 — JSPR account read via The Case Against Spirit Photographs (1921, Gutenberg, first-hand); Corbet claimed no ghost; hour-long exposure in an unlocked room

G-012UNPROVEN

The Combermere figure is Lord Combermere

Tranche 04 §3 — the SPR's own 1895 Barrett/Salt experiment DOCUMENTED the brief-sitter mechanism as sufficient, not as this photo's proven explanation

G-013UNPROVEN (both)

Hampton Court "Skeletor" CCTV figure (Oct 2003) is a ghost / is a hoaxer

Tranche 04 §4.2 — the CCTV event and palace statements are DOCUMENTED (AP wire, Dec 2003); no hoaxer identified, no confession; no gradeable original file in reach

G-014DOCUMENTED

Fort Wayne had a recognised haunted house in print by 1915 (Aveline House, Leo Road)

Tranche 04 §5.1 — Fort Wayne Daily News, 30 Oct 1915, p.1, read in full via ACGSI transcription

G-015UNPROVEN

The Allen County Courthouse phantom (catwalk, 4th floor)

Tranche 04 §5.2 — claim relayed on record by named Circuit Court Administrator Gayle Ort in the News-Sentinel; all sightings second-hand, witnesses unnamed

G-016UNPROVEN

Fort Wayne's Woman in White (Main Street bridge) is a 19th-century newspaper story

Tranche 04 §5.3 — legend DOCUMENTED in print 2015/2017; the claimed 1800s origin cites no newspaper or date; the magic-lantern "confession" inside the tale is double hearsay

Method — the five grades

Every claim is graded off the primary source itself, read first-hand — never off a documentary, a summary, or a retelling. Originals are saved and hashed on intake. Divergences between sources are logged openly, never silently fixed. Popular and official verdicts are evidence to examine, never conclusions to copy.

PROVEN

The primary record establishes it: a signed text, a court file, a measurement, a demonstration that can be repeated.

DOCUMENTED

On the record in a checkable source — a contemporary report, an official's statement, a published study — with the chain of custody stated.

UNPROVEN

Asserted, but the record behind it is missing, unexaminable, single-source, or contradicted. Most haunting claims live here, honestly.

MISIDENTIFIED

A real record carrying a wrong label: a discharge retold as an acquittal, a broadcast retold as a voice from the dead.

FABRICATED

Shown to have been made: a confession, a source-image match, a demonstrated manufacture.

The Archive

Primary sources read first-hand for Editions 1–2. Every file is hashed (SHA-256) on intake, never modified, and mirrored to the lab's archive storage; analysis runs on copies only.

Still Being Chased

The dig advances one lane item a day, first-hand. New graded findings publish here as editions.